-30%benefit cut for claiming at 62 vs. FRA 67 (SSA)
+24%benefit boost for delaying to age 70 (SSA)
2.8%2026 Social Security COLA (SSA)
$2,071average 2026 monthly retired-worker benefit (SSA)
Monthly benefit by claiming age (example: $2,000 at full retirement age)
Claim at 62$1,400/moFull age 67$2,000/moDelay to 70$2,480/mo
Source: Social Security Administration

The most important number in your retirement plan

Most people spend years worrying about their 401(k) balance and almost no time on the one retirement decision that is completely irreversible and completely under their control: the month they claim Social Security. For a typical household in Fort Wayne and across northeast Indiana, the lifetime value of Social Security runs into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. The claiming decision alone can swing that total by six figures.

Here is the honest version, without the sales hype. You can start your retirement benefit as early as age 62. You can wait as late as age 70. The Social Security Administration adjusts your monthly check up or down depending on when you file, and for the most part that adjustment is permanent. Claim early and you lock in a smaller check for life. Wait and you lock in a larger one.

There is no universally "right" answer, and anyone who tells you there is one is selling something. The right claiming age depends on your health, your savings, whether you are still working, whether you are married, and how the decision interacts with taxes and Medicare premiums. What we can do is lay out exactly how the numbers work — every figure below is drawn straight from the Social Security Administration — so you can make the call with clear eyes. When you are ready to run your own numbers, our retirement tools and a conversation through our contact page are the next step.

How claiming age changes your benefit (full retirement age 67)
Claiming age% of full benefit
6270%
6375%
6480%
6586.7%
6693.3%
67100%
70124%

What full retirement age actually means

The whole system pivots on a single benchmark: your full retirement age, often abbreviated FRA. That is the age at which you receive 100 percent of your calculated benefit, the amount Social Security refers to as your primary insurance amount. Claim before it and you take a reduction. Claim after it and you earn a bonus.

For anyone born in 1960 or later — which now covers everyone reaching age 62 — full retirement age is 67. People born from 1955 through 1959 have a full retirement age between 66 and 2 months and 66 and 10 months, sliding two months per birth year. Because virtually everyone making a fresh claiming decision in 2026 has an FRA of 67, that is the benchmark we use throughout this article.

It is worth being precise about why this matters. Your benefit is not simply "reduced if you retire early" in a vague sense. Social Security counts the exact number of months between the day you claim and the day you hit full retirement age, and applies a specific reduction for each of those months. The same is true on the other side: every month you delay past FRA earns a specific credit. This is arithmetic, not judgment, which is good news — it means you can calculate your own trade-off precisely instead of guessing. It also means small timing choices, like filing in January versus September, move real dollars.

One clarification that trips people up: full retirement age is not the same as Medicare eligibility, which begins at 65 regardless of when you claim Social Security. We will come back to how those two timelines interact, because claiming and Medicare enrollment are separate decisions that people often wrongly bundle together.

The cost of claiming early at 62

Age 62 is the earliest you can claim a retirement benefit, and it remains the single most popular age to file. It is also the most expensive in percentage terms. If your full retirement age is 67 and you claim at 62, your benefit is reduced by 30 percent and stays there for the rest of your life, apart from annual cost-of-living increases.

The reduction is built from two rates. According to the SSA, for the first 36 months before full retirement age, your benefit drops by five-ninths of one percent per month — about 0.555 percent monthly, or 6.7 percent per year. For any months beyond 36, the reduction is five-twelfths of one percent per month, roughly 0.416 percent, or 5 percent per year. Someone with an FRA of 67 who claims at 62 is filing 60 months early: 36 months at the higher rate plus 24 months at the lower rate works out to that 30 percent haircut. You can see the official mechanics on the SSA Retirement Age and Benefit Reduction page.

Put in dollars, the reduction is easy to feel. Take a worker whose full benefit at 67 would be $2,000 a month. Claiming at 62 drops that to roughly $1,400 a month — $600 less, every month, for life. Over a 25-year retirement that is a very large number, even before you account for the fact that the larger benefit would also have grown faster in dollar terms with each COLA.

None of this means claiming at 62 is a mistake. For someone in poor health, someone who was pushed out of work, or someone who genuinely needs the income to avoid draining savings in a down market, filing early can be the sensible choice. The point is to make that choice knowing it is a permanent 30 percent reduction, not a temporary one you can undo later.

The full percentage table, age by age

Between 62 and 67 the reduction shrinks smoothly, month by month, so you are not locked into an all-or-nothing choice. Every month you wait recovers a little of the reduction. The table below shows the standard checkpoints for a full retirement age of 67, straight from Social Security's own figures.

Read this as a menu, not a cliff. If claiming at 62 costs you 30 percent but you can bridge to 64 by working part-time or drawing modestly from savings, you cut the reduction to 20 percent. Reach your full retirement age of 67 and there is no reduction at all. Each year of patience is worth real money, and the value compounds because Social Security is one of the only sources of guaranteed, inflation-adjusted, lifelong income most retirees will ever have.

This is also where coordination with the rest of your plan starts to matter. If you have a bridge — a pension, a spouse still working, or a dedicated pool of savings — you can often afford to delay and capture a permanently higher check. Products such as annuities and other guaranteed-income strategies are sometimes used precisely to fund those bridge years so that Social Security can keep growing. That is a planning conversation, not a one-size answer.

Benefit by claiming age, full retirement age 67 (SSA)
Claim at age% of full benefitOn a $2,000 full benefit
6270.0%$1,400/mo
6375.0%$1,500/mo
6480.0%$1,600/mo
6586.7%$1,734/mo
6693.3%$1,866/mo
67100%$2,000/mo
68108%$2,160/mo
69116%$2,320/mo
70124%$2,480/mo

Delayed retirement credits: the 8% raise for waiting

The reduction table has a mirror image on the upside. If you delay claiming past your full retirement age, Social Security adds delayed retirement credits to your benefit. For anyone born in 1943 or later, those credits are worth 8 percent per year, accrued as two-thirds of one percent for each month you wait. The SSA lays this out on its Delayed Retirement Credits page.

Because full retirement age is 67 and the credits stop at 70, you have exactly three years to earn them, for a maximum increase of 24 percent. A worker whose full benefit is $2,000 at 67 would receive about $2,480 a month by waiting to 70. That is an extra $480 every month, permanently, on top of every future cost-of-living adjustment — and COLAs are calculated on the higher base, so the dollar gap between an early and a delayed claim widens a little every year.

An 8 percent guaranteed, inflation-protected annual increase is genuinely hard to match anywhere else in the financial world, which is why many advisors describe delaying Social Security as one of the best "returns" available to a healthy retiree. But two honest caveats apply. First, the credits stop cold at age 70 — there is zero benefit to waiting even one month longer, so no one should ever delay past their 70th birthday. Second, the 8 percent is only valuable if you live long enough to collect it, which is the heart of the break-even question we turn to next.

One technical note that saves people money: delayed credits earned during a year are not always fully reflected in your check until the following January. It is a paperwork quirk, it resolves itself, and it is worth knowing so an early-year statement does not alarm you.

The 2026 numbers: COLA, average, and maximum benefits

Percentages are abstract, so anchor them to what people actually receive. For 2026, Social Security announced a 2.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment, which took effect with January payments. According to the SSA 2026 COLA Fact Sheet, that raised the average monthly benefit for all retired workers to about $2,071, up roughly $56 from $2,015 in 2025.

At the top end, the maximum benefit for someone claiming at full retirement age in 2026 is $4,152 a month. Reaching that figure is rare — it requires having earned at or above the Social Security taxable maximum for roughly 35 years. Someone who both earned the maximum and delayed to 70 would receive even more, because the 24 percent in delayed credits stacks on top. The far more common reality is a benefit somewhere in the $1,500 to $2,500 range, which is exactly why the claiming-age decision is so consequential: a 30 percent swing on a $2,000 benefit is $600 a month.

Two things are worth underlining about the COLA. First, it protects your purchasing power but does not grow it — a 2.8 percent raise is meant to keep pace with inflation, not outrun it. Second, and this is the quiet compounding advantage of delaying, the COLA is applied to whatever base benefit you have locked in. A retiree who waited and secured a $2,480 benefit gets a larger dollar COLA every year than one who claimed early at $1,400, and that gap compounds across decades.

If you are still building toward retirement, it is worth pairing this with your own savings trajectory. Our overview of median retirement savings by age puts Social Security in context alongside what households actually have set aside, and our guide to the 2026 retirement contribution limits covers how to keep building the savings that can fund a claiming-age delay.

Break-even: when does waiting actually pay off?

Here is the trade every claiming decision comes down to. Claim early and you collect smaller checks starting sooner. Delay and you collect larger checks but forgo years of payments in between. The break-even age is the point at which the cumulative dollars from the two strategies cross — after which the later claim pulls permanently ahead.

A simple illustration using a $2,000 full benefit shows the shape of it. Claiming at 62 gives $1,400 a month; waiting to 67 gives $2,000. The person who claimed early banks five years of checks — roughly $84,000 — before the later claimant collects a dime. But the later claimant's checks are $600 a month bigger, so they close that gap over time. In round numbers, the two strategies break even somewhere in the late 70s to early 80s. Comparing a claim at 67 versus waiting to 70 lands in a similar zone. These are illustrative figures to show the mechanism, not an SSA-published guarantee; your exact crossover depends on your benefit and any COLA assumptions.

So the break-even question reduces to a longevity question: do you expect to live past your early 80s? For a healthy 62-year-old, the odds are meaningfully in favor of yes, and for a married couple the odds that at least one spouse lives well into their late 80s or 90s are higher still. That is the real insight: Social Security is not an investment to be optimized against average life expectancy — it is longevity insurance. Delaying is most valuable precisely in the scenario you cannot afford, the one where you live a very long time and risk outliving your savings.

The flip side is equally honest. If you have a serious health condition, a family history of shorter lifespans, or you simply value cash in hand today, claiming earlier can be the rational choice, and there is no shame in it. Break-even math is a tool, not a verdict. We walk clients through their specific numbers when we sit down together, because the right answer is personal.

Working while you claim: the earnings test

A lot of people want to claim Social Security and keep working, at least part-time. That is allowed, but if you claim before full retirement age, the retirement earnings test can temporarily withhold part of your benefit. This is one of the most misunderstood rules in the entire system, so it is worth getting right.

For 2026, if you are under full retirement age for the whole year, Social Security deducts $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above $24,480. In the calendar year you reach full retirement age, the limit is much higher — $65,160 — and the withholding softens to $1 for every $3 over the limit, counting only earnings before the month you hit FRA. Starting the month you reach full retirement age, the earnings test disappears entirely and you can earn any amount with no reduction. The details are on the SSA Receiving Benefits While Working page.

The crucial nuance most people miss: money withheld by the earnings test is not lost. When you reach full retirement age, Social Security recalculates and gives you credit for the months benefits were withheld, effectively raising your ongoing check. So the earnings test is better understood as a deferral than a penalty. Still, it means claiming early while earning a solid paycheck often makes little sense — you may be reducing your benefit for early filing and having much of it withheld anyway.

Two more points. Only earned income from a job or self-employment counts toward the test — pensions, investment income, IRA withdrawals, and annuity payments do not. And the test applies solely before full retirement age; once you are past FRA, work as much as you like with no benefit reduction at all.

Taxes and IRMAA: the parts people forget

Your claiming decision does not end with the SSA. Two other rules — benefit taxation and Medicare premium surcharges — quietly reshape how much of your Social Security you actually keep, and both are driven by income.

Social Security benefits can be partially taxable at the federal level depending on your combined income — your adjusted gross income, plus any tax-exempt interest, plus half of your Social Security benefits. Per the SSA's taxation guidance, a single filer with combined income between $25,000 and $34,000 may owe tax on up to 50 percent of benefits, and above $34,000 on up to 85 percent. For married couples filing jointly the thresholds are $32,000 and $44,000. These thresholds are not indexed to inflation, so over time more retirees cross them. Note too that Indiana does not tax Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits — the Indiana Department of Revenue lets you deduct them back out on your Indiana return — so for our local clients the taxation of benefits is a federal question only. Indiana does tax most other retirement income, at a flat 2.95% state rate plus your county's local income tax rate.

Then there is IRMAA — the income-related monthly adjustment amount — which raises your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums if your income is high. For 2026, the surcharge kicks in once modified adjusted gross income exceeds roughly $109,000 for single filers or $218,000 for married couples filing jointly, based on your tax return from two years prior. The SSA explains the sliding scale on its Medicare Premiums page. This is where claiming interacts with the rest of your plan in ways people rarely anticipate: a large IRA withdrawal or Roth conversion in the same year you claim can push you over an IRMAA threshold and raise your Medicare premiums two years later.

The practical takeaway is that the sequence of your income sources matters as much as the claiming age itself. Coordinating Social Security timing with withdrawals from your 401(k), IRA, and taxable accounts — and modeling the tax and IRMAA effects — is exactly the kind of planning our retirement tools are built to surface before you file.

Married couples: spousal and survivor benefits change everything

If you are married, claiming age stops being an individual decision and becomes a household strategy. Two additional benefits — spousal and survivor — can make delaying far more valuable than the single-person math suggests.

A spousal benefit lets a husband or wife receive up to 50 percent of the higher earner's full retirement amount, which is especially important when one spouse earned much less or spent years out of the workforce. Spousal benefits are reduced if claimed before the receiving spouse's full retirement age, and importantly they do not earn delayed retirement credits — the spousal amount maxes out at 50 percent at FRA, so there is no reason for the lower earner to delay a spousal benefit past their own full retirement age.

The survivor benefit is where delaying really pays off. When one spouse dies, the survivor generally steps up to the larger of the two benefits and the smaller one goes away. That means the higher earner's decision to delay to 70 does double duty: it maximizes their own check while they are alive and locks in the largest possible survivor benefit for whichever spouse lives longer. Given that one member of a couple frequently lives into their late 80s or 90s, this often makes it worth having the higher earner delay as long as possible — even if the lower earner claims earlier to get household cash flowing.

This is genuinely complex, and the optimal pattern — who claims when, and how spousal and survivor benefits stack — varies household by household. Divorced individuals may also qualify for benefits on an ex-spouse's record if the marriage lasted at least 10 years. Before you file, it is worth mapping the whole picture. That is a conversation we have every week with couples across northeast Indiana, and it usually starts with a simple consultation.

Fitting claiming age into the whole plan

Step back and the theme is clear: the best claiming age is the one that fits your whole retirement-income plan, not a number you pick in isolation the month you turn 62. The headline reduction and delayed-credit percentages are just the starting point. Your health and family longevity, whether you are still working, your tax bracket, your Medicare premiums, your spouse's situation, and how much guaranteed income you already have all pull the answer in different directions.

A useful way to think about it is coverage. Social Security is guaranteed, inflation-adjusted income you cannot outlive — the most valuable kind. If your fixed expenses in retirement exceed what Social Security and any pension will cover, closing that gap with your own savings or with guaranteed-income strategies may free you to delay Social Security and lock in the largest possible lifelong, survivor-protected check. If instead you have ample savings and expect a shorter horizon, claiming earlier to spend your own money later can make sense. Both can be right answers for different people.

What we would caution against is defaulting into a claiming age by accident — filing at 62 simply because it is the first year you can, or waiting to 70 without checking whether your health and cash flow support it. This is a decision worth modeling deliberately, once, with real numbers. Our retirement planning tools can show you the trade-offs side by side, and our contribution-limit guide can help you keep building the savings that give you the freedom to choose.

Tim Berry Financial Services is an independent, fee-conscious practice in Fort Wayne serving clients across northeast Indiana. We do not sell hype, and we are not licensed to give you a one-size answer in a blog post. What we can do is sit down, run your specific numbers, and help you make the claiming decision with confidence. When you are ready, reach out and we will plan your claiming age together.

Spousal Benefits in Depth: The 50% Rule and Why Your Own Claiming Date Still Matters

Most people know a spouse can collect "half" of the other's Social Security. The real rules are more specific, and getting them wrong can cost a household thousands a year. A spousal benefit is worth up to 50% of the higher earner's primary insurance amount (PIA) — the benefit that worker would get at full retirement age (FRA), which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later.

Three conditions must line up. The lower-earning spouse must be at least 62 (or caring for the worker's child under 16 or disabled). The higher earner must have already filed for their own benefit — you cannot claim on a record that hasn't been activated. And that 50% is only the maximum: you reach it by waiting until your own FRA. Claim early and it is permanently reduced — a spouse whose FRA is 67 who files at 62 receives roughly 32.5% of the worker's PIA, not 50%.

Here is the detail that surprises couples most: spousal benefits do not earn delayed retirement credits. Your own retirement benefit grows about 8% a year for every year you wait past FRA up to 70. A spousal benefit does not. It caps at 50% of PIA at your full retirement age, so there is no reward for delaying it past 67.

There is also the "deemed filing" rule. If you were born on or after January 2, 1954, and file before your FRA, Social Security treats you as filing for both your own retirement benefit and any spousal benefit at once, and pays the higher of the two — not both stacked together. The old strategy of taking only a spousal benefit early while letting your own record grow to 70 is gone for this age group. Running your own numbers first is the whole game; our retirement tools and a conversation with our office can show which order produces the most lifetime income.

Survivor Benefits in Depth: How a Widow or Widower Can Protect the Larger Check

Spousal and survivor benefits are two different things, and the difference is enormous. While both spouses are alive, the most a spouse can add is 50% of the worker's PIA. Once a worker dies, the surviving spouse can step up to as much as 100% of what the deceased was receiving — including any delayed retirement credits earned. This is why delaying the higher earner's benefit is often really a decision about the survivor: the bigger that check grows, the bigger the survivor's check becomes.

A surviving spouse generally qualifies at 60 (50 if disabled), or at any age if caring for the deceased's child under 16. Claiming early carries a reduction: filed at 60, a widow or widower receives about 71.5% of the deceased's benefit, climbing to the full 100% at the survivor's full retirement age.

Survivor benefits also open a planning move retirement benefits do not allow. Because they are calculated separately, a survivor can often take one benefit first and switch later — for example, claim a reduced survivor benefit at 60 while letting her own retirement benefit grow to 70, then switch to the larger own check (or the reverse). Which sequence wins depends on whose record is larger, so it is worth modeling rather than guessing.

One trap catches millions: the widow(er)'s limit, known inside Social Security as RIB-LIM. If the deceased claimed a reduced benefit early, the survivor's benefit is capped at the greater of what the deceased was actually receiving or 82.5% of the deceased's PIA. So when a higher earner claims at 62 and locks in a permanently reduced check, they may also be capping what their survivor can ever receive. Roughly a third of aged-widow beneficiaries have their benefit held down this way — one more reason the higher earner's early-claiming decision deserves extra thought.

The higher earner isn't just choosing their own benefit — they're often setting the floor, and the ceiling, for whichever spouse lives longer.

Divorced-Spouse Benefits and the 10-Year Marriage Rule

If your marriage lasted at least 10 years and you are now divorced, you may be able to claim on your former spouse's record — and it takes nothing away from them or their current spouse. This is one of Social Security's most under-claimed benefits, largely because people assume divorce ends any connection to an ex's earnings history. It does not.

To collect, you generally must meet all of these: the marriage lasted 10 years or longer; you are at least 62; you are currently unmarried; and the benefit on your ex's record is higher than on your own. As with a current spouse, the amount is up to 50% of your ex's PIA at your full retirement age, reduced if you claim earlier.

Divorced-spouse benefits carry one advantage over benefits for married couples: if you have been divorced at least two years, your ex does not have to have filed — they only need to be old enough to qualify (62). A married spouse, by contrast, must wait for the worker to file. So a divorced spouse can sometimes begin sooner.

A few practical notes. Your ex is never notified, and their benefit is unaffected. If your ex has died, you may instead qualify for a surviving divorced-spouse benefit worth up to 100%, under the age-60 survivor rules — and remarriage after 60 does not disqualify you, though remarrying before 60 generally ends survivor eligibility on that record. If you were married 10+ years to more than one person, you may be able to choose the record that pays more. These cases get complicated fast; we're glad to help you sort out which record works best in a no-pressure review.

The Social Security Fairness Act: WEP and GPO Have Been Repealed

This is the biggest change to Social Security in years, and it directly helps a group of Fort Wayne-area workers who were penalized for decades: teachers, firefighters, police officers, and other public employees who earned a pension from a job that did not withhold Social Security taxes. On January 5, 2025, the Social Security Fairness Act was signed into law, repealing two long-standing provisions that reduced or wiped out benefits for these workers.

The two provisions were the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), which shrank a public worker's own Social Security retirement benefit if they also had a non-covered pension, and the Government Pension Offset (GPO), which cut — often to zero — the spousal or survivor benefit of someone who received a non-covered government pension. For many surviving spouses, GPO erased a survivor benefit entirely.

Both are now gone. The change applies to benefits payable for January 2024 and later (December 2023 was the last month the old rules applied), so many people are owed retroactive money in addition to a higher monthly check. According to Social Security, more than 3.2 million people were affected by these provisions. The agency began adjusting payments in February 2025 and, as of July 2025, reported it had sent over 3.1 million retroactive payments totaling roughly $17 billion, along with the higher ongoing monthly amounts.

If you or your spouse spent a career in non-covered public employment and were told years ago that Social Security "wouldn't pay you much" or "would offset your survivor benefit," it is worth revisiting that assumption now. Some people who never bothered to file — because WEP or GPO would have zeroed out the benefit — may now be eligible and should apply. Make sure Social Security has your current mailing address and direct-deposit information so any adjustment reaches you. For the official details and status updates, see Social Security's Fairness Act page.

  • Who is helped: public-sector workers with a pension from non-covered work — many teachers, police, firefighters, and federal CSRS employees.
  • WEP repealed: your own retirement benefit is no longer reduced because of a non-covered pension.
  • GPO repealed: your spousal or survivor benefit is no longer offset by a non-covered pension.
  • Effective for benefits payable January 2024 onward, with retroactive back pay for many.
  • If a past offset kept you from filing, consider re-checking your eligibility now.

How Benefits Are Taxed — and How the New Senior Deduction Fits In

A caution on "up to 85% taxable": that is not an 85% tax rate. It means as much as 85 cents of every benefit dollar can be added to your taxable income and taxed at your ordinary rate. Many retirees still owe little or nothing once deductions apply.

That brings up a widely misunderstood change. The 2025 tax law created a new senior deduction of up to $6,000 per person for taxpayers 65 or older, for tax years 2025 through 2028 ($12,000 for a couple where both are 65+). It is available whether you itemize or take the standard deduction and stacks on top of the existing extra standard deduction for seniors. It phases out starting at $75,000 of modified adjusted gross income for singles ($150,000 joint) and disappears entirely at $175,000 single / $250,000 joint.

Despite the headlines, this did not eliminate tax on Social Security — the provisional-income tiers above still stand. What it does is lower taxable income for eligible older filers, so for many middle-income retirees less of their benefit is effectively taxed. It is scheduled to expire after 2028 unless Congress extends it. Because it interacts with your other income and IRA withdrawals, it is worth mapping out before year-end. We are not tax preparers, but coordinating withdrawals and retirement income around these thresholds is central to our planning — and it pairs well with a realistic look at your savings compared to your peers.

Portion of Social Security benefits that may be taxable, by combined income
Filing statusCombined incomeUp to this share of benefits is taxable
SingleUnder $25,0000%
Single$25,000 - $34,000Up to 50%
SingleOver $34,000Up to 85%
Married filing jointlyUnder $32,0000%
Married filing jointly$32,000 - $44,000Up to 50%
Married filing jointlyOver $44,000Up to 85%

Frequently asked questions

Is claiming Social Security at 62 always a mistake?

No. Claiming at 62 permanently reduces your benefit by about 30 percent if your full retirement age is 67, but it can be the right choice for someone in poor health, someone who lost their job, or someone who needs the income to avoid draining savings in a bad market. It is only a mistake if you claim early without understanding that the reduction is permanent. The key is to choose deliberately rather than by default.

How much more do I get by waiting until 70?

If your full retirement age is 67, delaying to 70 earns delayed retirement credits of 8 percent per year, for a total increase of 24 percent. On a $2,000 full benefit, that is roughly $2,480 a month instead of $2,000 — and that larger base also receives every future cost-of-living adjustment. There is no benefit to waiting past 70, so no one should ever delay beyond their 70th birthday.

What is the 2026 cost-of-living adjustment and average benefit?

Social Security announced a 2.8 percent COLA for 2026, effective with January payments. That raised the average monthly benefit for all retired workers to about $2,071, up roughly $56 from 2025. The maximum benefit for someone claiming at full retirement age in 2026 is $4,152 a month, though reaching that requires decades of maximum earnings. Figures are from the SSA 2026 COLA Fact Sheet.

Can I work and collect Social Security at the same time?

Yes, but if you claim before full retirement age, the earnings test may temporarily withhold benefits. In 2026, Social Security deducts $1 for every $2 you earn above $24,480 if you are under FRA all year, with a higher $65,160 limit in the year you reach FRA. Withheld amounts are not lost — they are credited back once you reach full retirement age. After FRA, there is no earnings limit at all.

Are my Social Security benefits taxable?

They can be, depending on your combined income — your adjusted gross income, tax-exempt interest, and half of your benefits. Single filers with combined income above $25,000 may owe tax on up to 50 percent of benefits, and above $34,000 up to 85 percent. For married couples filing jointly the thresholds are $32,000 and $44,000. Indiana does not tax Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits, so for our local clients the taxation of benefits is a federal issue only — though Indiana does tax most other retirement income at its flat state rate plus a county local income tax.

How does claiming age affect my spouse?

Substantially. A spousal benefit can be up to 50 percent of the higher earner's full amount, and a survivor benefit lets the surviving spouse step up to the larger of the two checks. That makes it often worthwhile for the higher earner to delay to 70, maximizing both their own benefit and the survivor benefit for whichever spouse lives longer. Coordinating both spouses' claiming ages is a household decision worth planning carefully.

Educational content, not individualized financial, tax, or insurance advice. Figures are current as of July 31, 2026 and sourced above; verify with a licensed advisor before acting.